To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Clearly, this was true of the Napoleonic Empire, which made rapid gains by conquest in the first decade after Napoleon became dictator of France , but became over-extended militarily when it attempted to conquer Russia in Eerdmans Publishing — via Google Books. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Aside from the sheer complexity of explaining the constant flux of global power dynamics, any discussion of this subject is made more challenging due to the problematic nature of what empire actually means. Dacia and Mesopotamia after that and could not keep the Saxons, Huns and other ‘barbarians’ out in the 4th and 5th centuries. Germany in Soviet Policy from Stalin to Gorbachev.
This, along with the Sino-Soviet split, demonstrated that the monolithic power arrangements that had been solidified in the years following World War II up into the s would not remained fixed. Clearly, this was true of the Napoleonic Empire, which made rapid gains by conquest in the first decade after Napoleon became dictator of Francebut became over-extended militarily when it attempted to conquer Russia in Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Like Alexis de Tocqueville, who Kennedy could impeerial as a predecessor, he saw an emergent bipolar world, dominated by Russia and the United States.
The Danger of Imperial Overstretch | Foreign Policy Journal
The Realities and Consequences of U. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Notes  Kennedy, Paul. Westad argues that this is particularly true within the context umperial U.
Rostow embeds this type of policy in the language of partnership particularly with Europe and balance of power rather than hegemony, avoiding the subtext of American dominance in such a relationship.
You are commenting using your WordPress. A highly integrated central metropole, a periphery that is fractured enough not to provide any reasonable competition, and a common interest religious, military, political that can integrate the periphery with the metropole.
McDougall interprets the United States foreign policy as seeking and supporting the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world. Might the whole idea of America eventually be challenged and destroyed by some charismatic new faith: Email required Address never made public.
By continuing to thesos this website, you agree to their use. Ferguson cites the pre-World War I British Empire, which declined as a result of distractions from policing old and new commitments in Asia and Africa, as a cautionary tale of empirical overstretch. As Giovanni Arrighi and Beverly J.
In this case, Smil states that the rapid ascendancy of China was a surprise to policymakers. Layne argues that this policy included not only suppressing the influence of the Soviet Union where it could, but also ensuring the preponderance of American influence.
Great Transformations in International Politics Cambridge: Hannes Adomeit has also written about this concept, as is apparent in his similarly titled work, Imperial Overstretch: Views Read Edit View history. You are commenting using your Google account.
Vaclav Smil has also elaborated on the unpredictability of international power dynamics, demonstrating the stark differences between the geoeconomic experiences of Russia and China in the last four decades. The other major issue in any exploration of the historiography of imperial overstretch is the methodology various authors have employed to describe it. Jason Weixelbaum Publications and Research. Arguably, this was true of the Roman Empirewhich was strong and effective in the first and early second centuries CE, despite a few setbacks Germany in 9CE; Scotland in the 80s CE but lost territories e.
The idea of imperial overstretch is ovetstretch new to modern history. impsrial